Jesus in
his solidarity with the marginal ones is moved
to compassion. Compassion constitutes a radical form of criticism, for it
announces that the hurt is to be taken seriously, that the hurt is not to be
accepted as normal and natural but is an abnormal an unacceptable condition for
humanness. In the arrangement of “lawfulness” in Jesus’ time, as in the ancient
empire of Pharaoh, the one unpermitted quality of relation was compassion.
Empires are never built or maintained on the basis of compassion. The norms of
law (social control) are never accommodated to persons, but persons are
accommodated to the norms. Otherwise the norms will collapse and with them the
whole power arrangement. Thus the compassion of Jesus is to be understood not
simply as a personal emotional reaction but as a public criticism in which he
dares to act upon his concerns against the entire numbness of his social
context. Empires live by numbness. Empires, in their militarism, expect
numbness about the human cost of war. Corporate economies expect blindness to
the cost in terms of poverty and exploitation. Governments and societies of
domination go to great lengths to keep the numbness intact. Jesus penetrates
the numbness by his compassion and with his compassion takes the first step by
making visible the odd abnormality that had become business as usual. Thus
compassion that might be seen simply as generous goodwill is in fact criticism
of the system, forces, and ideologies that produce the hurt. Jesus enters into
the hurt and finally comes to embody it.
1 comment:
spot on.
Post a Comment